logo
HomeArticlesAbout
About PensoftBooksJournalsBlog
Register | Login
Response
Rethinking Ecology 4: 103-114
https://doi.org/10.3897/rethinkingecology.4.33383 (14 Jun 2019)
Other versions:
ABOUT PENSOFT
  • Company Profile
  • Innovations & Tools
  • Open Access & APC Policies
  • Terms of Use
  • Editorial Policies
PRODUCTS
  • Journals
  • Advanced Books
  • Conventional Books
  • Conference Abstracts
  • Conference Proceedings
SERVICES
  • For Authors
  • For Journals
  • For Books
  • For Conferences
  • For Organisations
PROJECTS
  • Research Projects
  • Services
  • Partners
  • Brochure
ARPHA
  • ARPHA Publishing Platform
  • ARPHA Manual
  • ARPHA Pricing
  • Web Services
GET IN TOUCH
  • Contacts
  • Publishing Inquiry
  • Migrate Your Journal
  • Open a New Journal
  • Follow PENSOFT
  • Blog & News Subscribe
  • Media Center
  • © Pensoft Publishers 2023
XML
PDF
cart
 
 
Twitter
Facebook
Mendeley
Reddit
Notify a colleague
  • ContentsContents
  • Article InfoArticle Info
  • CitationCitation
  • MetricsMetrics
  • CommentComment
  • RelatedRelated
  • TaxaTaxa
  • RefsRefs
  • CitedCited
  • Article title
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Documenting inverse size assortment and alternative reproductive tactics in a high density spawning aggregation
    • 1. False observations of spawning events involving a single male with multiple females
    • 2. No empirical evidence of single male – multiple female spawning in P. areolatus, groupers, or any other coral reef fish
    • 3. No theoretical support for single male – multiple female spawning in broadcast spawning fishes
    • 4. Insufficient evidence that observations were made during the actual spawning period
    • 5. No evidence of “inverse size-assortment” due to invalid methods used to estimate courtship rates
  • Conclusions
  • Author contributions
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Powered by

This website uses cookies in order to improve your web experience. Read our Cookies Policy

OK